Globalization is tricky to understand.
It is a contested concept, which many try to wrap their heads around. One of the main points that many people take
away from globalization is the concept of increased interconnectivity. Today,
more than ever before people around the world are connected with one another,
whether it is over the Internet, the phone, or simply the same brand of
sneakers they wear on their feet. We have seen a huge increase in economic and
financial flows across borders. Nations are exchanging goods, services, ideas,
and cultures with one another, which has made the earth that we live on much
smaller than it was 200 years ago. There are many positive aspects of
globalization, as it has increased trade across the world, and bettered the livelihood
of millions with increases in technology and medicine. But one of the major
critiques of globalization is the deculturalization effect that it has on many
cultures around the world. Many argue that globalization is ruining the
cultures of many people, homogenizing nations, and killing nationalism. But,
the game of soccer is a great example of how nationalism and globalization can
co-exist with one another.
With the increased influx of goods,
services, knowledge, cultures, etc. across borders many worry that globalization
will crush nationalism. The idea of “Americanization” is very prominent today
in the globalization conversation. We should ask: Is the United States along
with other first world countries destroying cultures left and right as
globalization and western culture spreads its reign. The game of soccer says
no.
Soccer, the most popular sport in
the world today, drawing in more than 250 million players from over 200
countries, is a great example of how nationalism and globalization can
co-exist. As Franklin Foer, author of “How Soccer Explains the World” stated,
“soccer teams don’t just represent players, they represent social class, religion,
and nationality”. An increased interconnectedness from globalization was
supposed to crush nationalism, but events such as the World Cup show us that
nationalism can co-exist with globalization.
The sport of soccer is the most
globalized sport in the world. The love for the game is shared amongst people
from over 200 different countries. Soccer brings together people from all
reaches of the earth, but it doesn’t trample their cultures and beliefs in the
process like globalization does. Out on the pitch and in the stadium is where
those cultures are shone most vibrant. Fans, covered in their team’s colors,
cheer and fight their hearts out for their team, representing a unique culture
shaped by various political, religious, and social beliefs. Soccer is a billion
dollar industry, which prides itself on the uniqueness and diversity of its
fans and the people who play the game. The sport of soccer is unique in a way
as it represents the cultural diversity of the world in which we live.
Nationalism and globalization shine bright on the pitch as we see a world more
connected and diverse than ever before.
Soccer is a
great representation of how nationalism and globalization can co-exist but
unfortunately I do not believe it represents a plausible model for how we can
protect the integrity of cultures around the world from wrath of globalization.
The overwhelming number of goods, services, and ideas coming from the hegemon
of the free world has killed off many unique and vulnerable cultures of third
world countries. Many see globalization creating a more homogenized world, with
fewer borders and less cultural diversity than ever before.
Sources:
Foer, Franklin. How Soccer Explains the World: An Unlikely Theory of Globalization. New York: HarperCollins, 2004. Print.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Amo1b3BUgc
Sources:
Foer, Franklin. How Soccer Explains the World: An Unlikely Theory of Globalization. New York: HarperCollins, 2004. Print.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Amo1b3BUgc
Trevor, you make very good points about how, through soccer, globalization and nationalism can co-exist. One thing that came to my mind was the U.S. national team. Americans didn't used to care about soccer but went mad over the last World Cup; in a way, Americans assimilated to following the globalized sport. Granted, the U.S. is the exception in this case, as most of the rest of the world has been crazy about soccer for a long time now, but it's interesting to consider an example that's counter to the "Western ideas" narrative.
ReplyDeleteLike Lowell, I liked your point regarding the way in which nationalism and globalization co-exist in the realm of soccer. Additionally, I though your argument was stronger when you also identified the negative aspects of globalization.
ReplyDelete