Bosnia has gained welcome from the
United States and a majority of the EU to begin working towards membership in
the European Union. The people of Bosnia, a spawn country of Soviet Russia,
received a letter from the foreign ministers of Britain and Germany, two of the
more powerful states in the European Union, which discussed the region’s future
and a possible application to the desired European Union. The plan for Bosnia,
headed by Britain and Germany for the most part, is to begin working with Bosnian
politicians to ensure a commitment to unifying their currently divided country
in order to make it more functional. Should Bosnian politicians cooperate and
succeed, and after an undisclosed amount of progress that the EU describes as
“some initial progress”, Bosnia would receive an invitation to apply to the EU.
With so many other world conflicts and situations, economically and socially,
why on Earth is the European Union devoting attention to recruiting
such a country as Bosnia?
In a letter asking the United
States to consider engagement in Bosnia, Zivko Budimir, the President of the
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (one of Bosnia’s entity/states) describes
the region’s natural resources as areas of attractive potential investment. However,
most of the letter, along with many of the current economic and social
situations that have to be overcome and are pointed out by Britain and Germany,
make Bosnia seem like a nation nowhere near fit to receive an application to
the EU. Two current facts of Bosnia noted by Budimir that, right off the bat,
are very unattractive on the nations résumé include 1.) A 40% unemployment rate
and 2.) The majority of foreign investment in Bosnia comes from the Middle East
and the East and is rising. The rest of the letter indicates no plans to fix
these what-would-be unique traits to Bosnia if they were in the EU, but instead
addresses the fact that Bosnia’s civil society is a complex, tense, and weak one. The
nation, since it’s founding in 1992, has been made up of three different and distinct
ethnicities in a society that has exemplified failed human rights for years.
Since the end of the Bosnian Civil War in 1995, minorities of the region have
suffered lack of basic societal rights similar to those that existed in the US
until the 1960’s. These minorities still are literally not allowed to hold
upper positions in the clearly unstable, three-president led government. Among
the three majority ethnicities, the Serbs continue to halt and unified strength
to Bosnia by demanding more power to their mini-state within the nation. To
wrap up this brief list of the main problems with Bosnia, in 2009, Jakob Finci
who is Jewish and Dervo Sejdic, a Roma, (both are minorities), successfully
challenged the section of the Bosnian government that forbade minorities from
holding select upper government positions. To this day, no progress toward
fixing this inequality of the Bosnian government has been achieved. These human rights violations and Bosnia's current government structure are very unique in comparison to current members of the EU. The pattern of little change in the nation since the end of their civil wars suggest that perhaps these policies and structures are not very efficient developing into an attractive, successful state.
With the current fight in the
Middle East, uncertainty as to Russia’s next move, and a sinking European
economy, you’d think the EU would have a lot on its plate at this time. However
in the past month, a considerable amount of time and attention has been given
to Bosnia. It’s quite clear that Bosnia needs social reform in their bizarre
tri-presidential led government soon, and will likely need the help of the EU
and the US (which they would love) if they want it to be effective. In
assisting them, however, it seems as though the EU (Britain and Germany) think
they might as well just bring Bosnia on into the club. This would call for financial
investment, possible disagreement or conflict within Bosnia’s extremely mixed
culture/society, and if the application was extended and fulfilled, a new
member to the EU that is relatively weak compared to all the others. And for
what? Natural Resources in Bosnia that no one really, really needs right now? It seems at this time, the EU has more
important things to worry about than gaining this country and maybe come back
to them once they accomplish something themselves.
Sources:
Mark this is very interesting. It seems that a bid to join the EU would be one of the best things to happen for Bosnia at this time. It would include institutional reform across the nation which would help lower the countries unemployment rate, as well as ease tensions amongst the three main ethnic groups. Though, I would think the EU would need more than just the promise of natural resources to extend a bid of membership to Bosnia.
ReplyDeleteMark, you do a fantastic job describing a situation I have not heard much about. You also do a really good job of characterizing both Bosnia's history and current situation, both filled with turmoil. The one thing I would question, though, is the claim that nations in the EU don't really need the natural resources and have better things to worry about. While I agree that, ideally, nations should not be motivated solely by natural resources, these resources are becoming more scarce and therefore coveted than ever. This alone may be motivation enough for the EU to try and include Bosnia, which despite criticisms they seem to be itching to do (whether they should or not).
ReplyDelete