A document that China submitted to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change goes on to state their expectations of the rest of the world, predominately developed western states and those who have ratified the Kyoto Protocol (the US did not) regarding the finances and technological logistics of reducing their own carbon emissions. These requests include payments of $1 Billion increments by developed western developed states, payments of 1% of GDP of these western developed states, and abolishment of western intellectual property rights which are argued to slow down technological advancement in developing countries regarding climate control. The document goes on to state that new plans for climate control should not only, as said, financed by the west, but should also be built upon the already existing Kyoto Protocol, which the US never ratified because of a disagreement regarding relaxed parameters the deal placed on the two of the biggest greenhouse gas producers in the world: China and India.
How Obama reacts toward China after these bold propositions will be interesting to look out for in the near future. It is pretty evident that by no means does China appear to believe that they are a ‘developed’ nation. Whether or not China is developed or developing can be argued extensively, however in this instance China appears to think they deserve to be treated like a strictly developing nation which severely needs the help of the western developed ones. When choosing how to deal with China regarding their demand for funds and technology, Obama and other western leaders should keep in mind exactly how China views themselves before making any decisions about assisting them with a problem which is in their “not developed” backyard. Of course the rest of the world has assisted China in creating the mess in one way or another, but whether or not Obama agrees China should avoid bearing the burden of the financial burden will contribute in whether he and others act in a liberal manner or one more similar to realism. The fact that China appears to be convinced that they are definitely not in the same league as western developed nations should also be noted when it comes to issues further down the road, involving the climate change or not. This is a pretty significant characterization of themselves and should definitely be taken into account when western nations choose to look out for their own interests or choose to bear this alleged burden upon themselves and agree with China’s assertions regarding how the climate change situation in their state should be dealt.
Mark, I found this very interesting to read, I did not know about this and it is very intriguing to me, as I am an Environmental Science and Policy Major. I think the argument over China's status as a developed/developing country is up in the air because there are many arguments that support both sides. But what I find interesting is that China, who has one of the world's biggest economies, is blaming the Western World and requiring financial help before they take any action. It is ridiculous for China to shift all of the blame off of themselves. They need to understand that the pollution, which they put into the air is their fault, no one else's. The Chinese government needs to do a better job regulating its industries, which annually are sending a large portion of the world greenhouse gases into our atmosphere. China can only point the finger at themselves on this one.
ReplyDeleteThis was a very interesting article on a topic I was not very informed on. Your description of how the United States deals with China's greenhouse gas emissions was also engaging. However, you characterize China as considering themselves a developing country in this case. Are you sure this is genuine or just an attempt by China to shirk responsibility? Overall, you did a very good job of examining the issue from multiple perspectives.
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing this Mark as I too have not been up to date on this situation. Green house gas emissions are increasingly important to address as they certainly pose an international threat and I am pleased that the issue has been presented by our President at the United Nations. To respond to Lowell, I do suspect that China is characterizing themselves as a developing nation in order to "shirk" this fiscal responsibility.
ReplyDeleteI think I may agree with Lowell to some degree: it seems like they use the label "developing" when it suits their interests. For me the question becomes: Are we going to have to wait until China decides it wants to do environmental stewardship on its own, or is there something we can do? Or will the "global community" convince them?
ReplyDelete